Former advisors say the changes go too far
A group of scientists who once led a federal panel advising Ottawa on endangered wildlife has gone public with sharp criticism of proposed changes to the Species At Risk Act. In an open letter, the former chairs argue the amendments don't just weaken the law — they could actively speed up the disappearance of vulnerable species from Canadian landscapes.
One scientist involved didn't mince words, describing the proposed changes as an attempt to "stab it to death" rather than simply reform it. That's a striking accusation aimed at legislation that's supposed to be one of the country's core tools for protecting plants, animals, and ecosystems that are running out of time.
Why this matters beyond the science community
The Species At Risk Act is the federal government's main legal mechanism for identifying and protecting Canada's most vulnerable wildlife, from woodland caribou to various fish and plant species. It sets out how species get listed as threatened or endangered, and what protections — including habitat safeguards — follow from that designation.
When former chairs of the panel responsible for advising on these very decisions raise a public alarm, it signals the concerns aren't fringe. These are people who spent years working directly within the system now warning that proposed changes could undermine its core purpose: preventing extinction.
The letter frames the stakes in stark terms, warning that watered-down protections could lead to what the signatories call "wilful extinction" — species disappearing not from an accident of policy, but from a conscious choice to loosen the rules that were supposed to protect them.
What's actually being proposed
While full details of the proposed amendments continue to be debated in Ottawa, the concern from scientists centres on how the changes could reshape decision-making processes and weaken protections currently baked into the law. For a piece of legislation built specifically to act as a backstop against extinction, any erosion of those mechanisms carries real consequences for species already on the brink.
For Ottawa residents, this debate plays out close to home — federal environmental policy is shaped and debated right in the nation's capital, and decisions made here ripple out to ecosystems across the country, from the boreal forest to coastal waters.
What comes next
As the proposed changes move through the federal process, expect more pushback from the scientific community, conservation groups, and possibly opposition MPs. Whether the government adjusts course in response to this kind of public criticism remains to be seen, but the open letter puts pressure on decision-makers to explain exactly how the changes will affect Canada's most vulnerable species.
Source: CBC News
